>>3379088You just need to up your game for recognizing good composition. You also need equipment that can take advantage of such things. Like wide aperture for subject isolation or a reverse ring/extension tube for cheap close-up/macro. Maybe you'll need a good off-camera flash. Perhaps you need telephoto to get, "flat," images or just wildlife in general. Could be that lomography is more your thing in the end. Regardless, you'll probably put 50k-100k photos through a camera before you get to the point where you are good at seeing things that can be good subjects. Even then it will be tough regardless of where you are.
