>>3351251Lol, thanks for letting us know you're not a professional photographer.
I offer a lot of stock photography and artistic installation pieces and my images are constantly stolen when I don't watermark them heavily.
Guess what, asshole, they still sell just fine when I watermark them heavily, usually obscuring 1/5th of the image with my logo and company name basically exactly like in pic related, which is how basically ALL freelance photographers do it, you fucking amateur imbecile.
>>3351253>they're going to think the picture has digital artifacting, because that's exactly what it looks likeThat's exactly what it is.
>assuming a photographer that uploads corrupted photos is some amateur tard.I already have a reputation. It must be terrible to be a loser like yourself who can't imagine being a professional photographer and having clientele already.
SAD!
