>>2692580>>2692597And have some 120 as well.
Sorry, this isn't actually full res, the files are normally 9000x6000 ish.
I had the wrong box checked on hugin for this roll.
But I already had to use 70%jpeg to fit it on 4chan, so the smaller size is probably better.
But the real big deal about using a camera to scan is the quality of files. You can make ridiculous colour and contrast adjustments whilst still keeping relatively smooth tonal gradations, and without exciting digital noise.
And this is with one of the cheapest, worst DSLRs on the market, with a really strong AA filter and low DR and terrible noise and canon banding and only 18MP.
Oh yeah, and you scan a whole roll in like 5 minutes.
What I don't understand is why flatbedders and drumscanners et al can't get with the program.
Those are expensive machines, they can almost certainly afford a camera and lens.
If they're shooting MF film, they clearly care about their IQ.
Don't they want better scans?
>the war is over, you lost>welcome your new rabal overlords 