>>3565033None of these are links, and you didn't quote anything relevant from the citations.
>>3565040>" In the normal eye acuity of resolution is about 35-50 seconds of arc."For 100% contrast line pairs?
>http://filmicworlds.com/blog/visual-acuity-is-not-what-the-eye-can-see/This is just general information that seems to support my assertion that you don't need resolutions that meet the limits of visual acuity because of how vision actually works, unless you're talking about extremely high contrast images, like black lines on white backgrounds.
>https://teq4.com/the-world-is-not-an-eye-chart/>Resolution is an important metric for the flight simulation industry for pilot training applications. A level-D simulator (suitable for commercial aircraft) stipulates a display resolution of only 1.5 arc minute sized pixels (3 arc minutes per line pair).>1.5 arc minuteLook at pic related and then apologize for how fucking dumb you are.
MFT IS FAR MORE THAN ENOUGH for large format printing.
