>>4197512>le absolute reach>le isos>le equivalence>le micrometersi dont think any of this matters that much.
do you make or do you if? let's test this bs about megapickel reach.
i have 42mp so if i crop to approximately a 1" sensors 2.7 crop factor i get an 8x10. f/11 adds a tiny bit of diffraction but nobody views photos at 100% web browser view like pic related, they're either resized for the web (<1000 pixels on the longest edge) or printed at 300 dots per inch and held at arms length. therefore it does not matter, no one will be able to tell. if you want to talk reach for magazine publication less than half this cropped photo could be used to headline an article. fuck it, crop more, add fake grain, people will take it. sharpness isn't everything.
https://www.naylor.com/support/advertising/print-ad-specifications/dont do this tho just use a zoom lense. idk about you, but i have never had to do this. i have never even had to use aps-c mode. this camera is overkill. there is no reason not to buy a 24mp full frame camera if you can swing it, it will have better image quality in some situations after all. how does your 90d or gh6 look if you do this? do the micrometer equivalence isos of absolute reach really improve your life? are you publishing super tiny crops from a 90d? post a picture. show us.
