>>3988250This perfectly illustrates your poor reading comprehension and misunderstanding of the scenario. I have NEVER stated that when shooting equal images, the sensor that has absorbed less light will have the same SNR. You are an idiot for thinking so. What I have repeatedly stated is that a M43 sensor (or a FF sensor with 3/4ths blocked out) should theoretically be capable of producing pic rel, and that this should theoretically have the same SNR as the remainder of the image, because the luminuous flux density or signal gathered in this region of the photo is the same regardless of sensor size.
Your retarded argument is that somehow magically the M43 sensor is incapable of achieving this, and that the irrelevant 3/4ths of the FF sensor somehow make this 1/4th region superior.
