>>3531552Listen, this is using the Print comparison, meaning if you were to print this out at 300dpi and scaled for equivalent size.
If you think the image on the left is worth $2000 more for just the body, plus a 30% premium on standard focal length primes and worse as you go telephoto, than be my guest and spend all that money to shoot a marginally better jpeg, you absolutely motherfucking dogshit stupid retard.
But if you want to save fistfulls of money, end up with equivalent IQ that literally no sane person in the world would POSSIBLE ever notice the difference between, especially after doing some NR in a flagship product like CaptureOne that gets rid of noise and preserves all details, instead of the in-camera jpgs (lol), then maybe you should sell your overpriced, under-performing Sony gear and upgrade to Olympus.
