>>3970113>>Vast majority of scenes fit within 12.4ev.>As stated previously, just because it can technically fit, doesn't mean it looks good. That is exactly what it means. The cutoff on DxO (and PtP's) DR models is the point at which noise starts to become obtrusive at common print sizes. The models are intended to test what is acceptable IQ to a human being.
DxO reports 12.4ev for the 5DsR and 14.8ev for the D850, a 2.4ev difference. If you look at DPReview's tool, you find that the 5DsR at +4ev is very similar to the D850 at +6ev. If anything DxO is overstating the difference as the 5DsR at +4 is slightly cleaner than the D850 at +6, and that's with the D850 at its lower native ISO.
Put another way, the 5DsR is as clean/usable with a 4ev push as the D850 with a 6ev push. A two stop difference, just as I said because that matches my experience with ACR/PS: you can push shadows +4ev if need be and be OK in print.
Now if you're willing to wait for DxO's noise reduction tool to do its magic, you can honestly get a +6ev shadow push out of a 5DsR. And the result is damn close to a D850 with standard NR in ACR. Rendering this even more of a moot point.
>It's not such a black and white issue you're making it out to be.It is pretty black and white, you just refuse to learn and insist on doubling down on your "canon dr bad mkay?" narrative. Which just boggles my mind. What experience do you have? Have you ever touched a 5DsR? I own a 5Ds and my friend owns a D850. I've had the chance to shot both side by side. Have you?And if not, what makes you think you can lecture me on DR and tell me I'm wrong?
>Now you'll get alignment errors if there's any wind. I don't because I manually blend. Which means most of the image comes from one frame or the other, not both.
>Stop comparing shit to film. YOU brought up slide film. YOU brought it up to imply that you have to shoot a 5DsR as carefully as slide film. YOU are wrong, so YOU stop bringing it up.
