>>4369855What is this bullshit? Why the fuck are you shitting up other threads, including /gear/, when you ran away a coward from the last thread we argued in, refusing to answer any questions and shit posting like a 12 year old?
Let's recap this debate:
- You have ZERO valid objections to the map comparison. The film side is sharp, detailed, well exposed, professionally shot and scanned on a drum scanner which resolved grain. Film just lost.
- You have ZERO valid objections to the portrait comparison. The film side is sharp, detailed, well exposed, professionally shot and scanned on a high end Noritsu scanner which resolved grain. Film just lost. It's 645 but if what you say about film is true, 645 should have won or at least pulled even. We can see the fucking grain which means a better scanner would NOT have helped.
- Your only maybe decent objection to the car tire comparison is relative tire size because I originally scaled to a crop they presented of the VW bug tire. I ran the numbers and scaling factor and made sure it was in the ballpark, but I should have scaled the whole image and then cropped the tires. Problem with your complaint is that the Corvette tire IS larger in real life. When you resized them you made the digital side obviously too small proving you're a liar or you've never seen a bug or a vette in real life. Note that tire bolts in mine are comparable in size meaning my scaling was certainly close, yours was a lie, and a pretty shitty one since the 5Ds won either way.
cont
