>>3599229>shitty 3:4 aspect ratio>not a much DOF as 6x6, 6x7, 6x9, etc.>you get more frames, may as well shoot 35mm to get even more frames>most cameras are portrait orientation >>3599447>3:2 is awkwardly longPretty much this, I've tried all aspect ratios and I've landed on 6x7 and I'm loving it.
6x6: Hard to frame, Instagram ruined square images
6x9: 35mm aspect ratio with the medium format look. Weird combo but the DOF is lovely, closest you'll get to large format without shooting large format.
645: has to turn the camera 90 degrees for landscape shots, snapshit aspect ratio
6x7: compromise of wideness/not being 1:1, closest to 4x5
>>3599264The other dude wanted to be convinced to stay away from medium format, that's some obvious cuckery shit right there his beta arms wouldn't even be able to hold a Fuji GA645.
I have no issues lugging around pic related for a full day of shooting, come at me
