>>4183170Nope. 4:5 is the best ratio for prints. 2:1 only looks good in a web browser . Have you ever hung up a 2:1 photo? They almost stand out too much and good premade frames are hard to find. If you're going to meme that hard just print 1:1.618.
Have a snapshit of a test run of snapshits I did to see if nations photo lab was gud.
now don't accuse that nophoto of being me ever again.
>>4183186>the one he let FUD make him hate because muh forced NR even though his Sony has a much bigger NR problem with the star eater. But he's too incompetent to focus through an OVF so he kept missing.I had the original K1 without the shadow pushing problems and don't care about astro. You're thinking of that kiwi cunt. If you're going to be a schizo at least be a correct one.
https://archived.moe/p/thread/4128650/#4133900i sold the 20mm since then and bought the 85mm f1.8. another lens that's hard to get without big compromises on K mount (literally big, kek). nikon, sony, and canon really have better FF lens selections for most people.
EVF/OVF does not matter unless it is a borderline useless OVF like a rangefinder (only excusable on cheap fixed lens cameras) or that stupid hybrid EVF/sears camera tier viewfinder on the larp fujis.
>>4183253marumi exus lens protect on everything.
