>>4254590>only green pixels have chroma noiseHoly retardation.
>"hurr canon is lying to me even though they never told me this"HOLY FUCKING COPE
>Here is the fact: If Canon figured out an algorithm which reduces RAW noise with no negative impact on IQ, and does so at 30 fps, that's just as valuable as an equal hardware gain. If Nikon and Sony can't figure this out then that's their fucking loss. I don't care whether a gain in IQ is made by an algorithm or a circuit. The circuits are fucking useless without algorithms to process their output any way. Improving those algorithms is a legitimate performance target. Maybe other manufacturers should hire programmers who are not fake degree pajeets.
>The ONLY noise reduction that has ever been detected in modern sony cameras is "star eater", LMFAO picrel
>Absolutely no damage to raw files is detected Other than missing details as large as a FUCKING STAR.
>Please stick to MEASURED, OBJECTIVE FACTS.FACT: Sony admits to RAW NR and actually advertises it as a feature.
FACT: PtP misses that Sony is applying NR to their RAWs which means PtP's evaluation of this metric cannot be trusted.
FACT: On many cameras Sony's RAW NR impacts detail.
FACT: if PtP is correct (no one else is bitching about it), then Canon's RAW NR works with zero impact on detail.
Cope, seethe, and lossy compress your RAWs snoy shill.
>In fact, the only other PROVEN, OBJECTIVELY FACTUAL raw damage in sony cameras is vignetting correction, lol baby mount
