>>3663341>Again you're reposting nonsense from 2010, where APS-C actually was a significant compromise.Here is a counter example instead of just some random text. D850 (Full frame) released at the same time as D500 (highest end APSC), around your claimed 2016 date. All of this data is 'print' which means it is compensated for difference in resolution.
Clearly the full frame sensor is superior in IQ in every aspect.
Whether this improvement is worth it or not, is a second question, but don't bullshit and pretend APSC is the same quality as FF. It is not. And claiming that it is is factually wrong and makes your argument look weak.
