>>3815640>lookskek cope
>I mean, i can walk around for 8 hours hand carrying my fuji, you willing to do the same with your hunk of plastic?I don't see how it has any disadvantages at that.
>>3815647Based
>>3815680>Yes, the venerated classics. No ones going to look back on canon/nikon and go yeah, those digital bodies were peak aesthetics. They have nice comfy vintage film bodies though. Easy in the hand, fun to shoot with.lol, Fujis are bad imitations of the classics. Tasteless retro larps desperate for faking some cachet they won't ever have. The neoclassic kit car of the camera world. Too poor to afford a SSK but too trashy to admit it and own up to it? You get a Gazelle. Too poor to afford a Leica but too trashy to admit it and own up to it? You get a Fuji "rangefinder style" camera. The entire design looks like they took a pic of a Leica and changed just enough things that a copyright infringement lawsuit couldn't be successful. Meanwhile when other manufacturers go for a retro look, they create new designs with the aesthetics, the spirit of the years they want to evoke.
