>>3760943Please go read a book on the basics of digital photography if you find the analog component of a digital sensor mysterious. In fact, if you actually watched that very video you posted (with your head taken out of your ass so you can hear it) you will learn about how a digital camera takes an analog signal and then converts it into a digital one.
> I explain >>3760919 as a poorly engineered sensor with a marketing dept. pretending it's not.Instead of creating nonsensical explanations in your inflated pseudointellectual noggin, how about you go learn what this “ISO invariance” term you keep carelessly throwing around actually means?
Autism can be pretty cool when it makes people math prodigies but it's annoying to have to deal with when it makes people arrogant and utterly incapable of humility.
