>>4299658>a bloo blooSorry bruh but paying $2000 for a Z6 dressed up as a fat FM3a doesn't make you rich, it's an explicit admission that you can't afford to shoot film or even afford more genuinely tasteful equipment ie: leica digital. Plus, yknow, almost everyone on /p/ who has an FF mirrorless is in the same price bracket.
The Zf is definitely not a super tasteful camera. From a recreation and fashion standpoint, it's a confusing rattly abortion that doesn't work like a film camera or a digital camera. The UX does not make sense and the look and experience is nonsensical with most native lenses except for voigts (poorfag leicas).
It is not a camera worth bragging about. I don't like fuji but even the xpro3 is more authentic and better at being what it is, down to fuji's typical lens designs. Maybe you could actually pretend to be financially carefree with that one since the used market is inflated, while the Zf is actually reasonably priced for the technology package.
