>>4134466yupyupyup I posted a side by side comparison of my Voigtlander 35mm versus my Sigma 35mm in some random gearfag thread months ago, in exactly the same way just like
>>4134345 did with his 105mm Sigma and 100mm Zeiss and I also made sure to have everything right, I was out in my back yard for like 30 minutes making sure I do everything right and this same exact Sigma-cock sucking chimpanzee still found some dumb excuse to disregard literal physical evidence of Sigma lenses sucking ass. just ignore the faggot and move on with your life
