>>2868778>It's got enough detail/texture/clarity that it bothers the eye yet there's nothing worth looking at/helps in no way the composition.Okay that makes sense to me.
>This one's better but you cut her fucking feet and there's no good reason on the framing to justify it.I fucked up and wasn't thinking about that sort of thing, this was a previous shoot. I tried working on that was my latest shoot, the 11 photos I posted above, and most of those I got the whole model in the shot when it seemed appropriate to do so.
>Also, I'd give it a warmer tone, fluorescent light makes everything look duller.The WB was very wonky with this image thanks to the fluorescent lighting. I originally had it a tad bit warmer, but that seemed to look worse to me, but that's my opinion.
>>2868789>free advice: stop getting so defensive.I wouldn't say I'm getting that defensive, I'm stating my point of view. I'm sure you've seen how other people react on /p/ when their work gets shit on. I'm reply back to most people with a level headed approach that gave me a level headed critique.
>Learn what makes a photograph shit, and then make sure your photos aren't shit.I only put what I think are the best photos from each shoot on my portfolio, it's usually only like 5 photos from 45 "keepers", and most of those "keepers" are the same location, just slightly different pose or expression, that's why it adds up so much because I want to give variety to the model.
Pic Related: This from an older shoot I did, once again with the model posted above.
