>>3894177>really don't know why people don't dslr scan more often.Because camera scanning doesn't only give results like the ones you're referring to, but also like this (
>>3893432).
Camera scanning, just like normal scanning, can be done properly but also improperly.
With a scanner, you're less likely to fuckup starting out, because things like even illumination, parallelism, profiles for inversion etc. you get guaranteed without having to fight for it.
