>>4104870Thanks a lot for your inputs
As I've said, I've only recently started actually liking my photographs, but I don't want to grow fond of them in a bad way and don't let people criticize it
It's good to hear criticism
When I started photographing I posted my stuff on /p/ and got absolutely destroyed by a guy, but he explained to me bit by bit why my pictures were shit and it was one of the most important things for me to learn about my mistakes, or even if I didn't quite agree with something, at least I got to think about the point made and consciously get to the conclusion of why I would keep doing some things (and let go of other things that were aesthetically shit, of course)
Anyway: it's an experimental film, it was my first time using it and I really liked the outcome. This film can be used from ISO 12 up to 3200, with usable results up to ISO 8000
I went for 800 because I'd like it contrasty, and it really went along with the concert's mood
As for this one
>>4104840 I would have done some things differently today (like having a higher DoF, as you mentioned), but it was nice digitalizing it after almost 3 years, seeing it properly after I've come to terms with photographs that I make, and I'm glad it happened this way
Otherwise, if I'd seen it back then, I'd probably dislike it just because
'cause I thought everything I made was shit
Anyway, I'll post a couple colored ones I like, but unfortunately they're not medium format
