Quoted By:
I'm feeling really... taken by the Canon EOS 3.
Film SLRs are really more my thing, but I can't help but feel like it's sort of a strange camera.
I don't own any EOS DSLRs, or any EF lenses. My only digital camera is a mirrorless.
As for EF lenses, I know they're not too awful in terms of pricing for reasonably bright primes, but when looking at building up primes for the focal lengths I like, things get pricier.
I have a Yashica FX-3, and while everyone here seems to drool over Zeiss lenses from that era, I can't help but feel like they're reasonable, but sort of flawed. The apertures aren't properly centred when stepped down (stepping down is the only option besides using ND filters in broad daylight with 400 film like Kodak Tri-X, as fastest shutter speed is 1/1000) and when wide open at f/2.8 or even f/1.4, the bokeh looks a bit crap (not that these lenses were meant for bokeh, but when using 200 or even 100 film in shady areas or during overcast days, wide open is necessary to get a fast enough shutter speed without needing a tripod).
I know there's stuff like the Contax AX, but that thing is like the size of a cinder block, probably weighs as much too.
