>>4339086I will say 33mp(a7 iv) vs 24mp is a bit of a difference on heavy crops(applicable for me since I primarily shoot wildlife). I feel like 33-40mp is the max sweet spot for FF, 24mp or lower is king for lowlight.
Personally I'd just get a rf 200-800 vs changing ecosystems for the reach.
>>4338730>calls r5 noisy>doesn't realize the higher the mp the worse the iso performance simply due to physics>schizo rant>retrotard who thinks he's the market majoritySounds like Leica is more your speed since you're treating your camera like a fashion statement.
However if you want a marginal upgrade for lowlight performance, refurbed r6mkii shows up on canon's site every so often, I got mine for 1599 with 4.5k shutter and it's fucking fantastic.
The r5mkii and r1 are pretty dumb, but they're oriented for hybrid shooting and sports specifically which is why they are not higher mp as they need lowlight performance. I can afford em but there's 0 reason for me to change bodies unless they drop something God tier in the next decade.
See picrel for your 60mp lmao.
