>>4155014>nigga starts talking gibberish about photons. snake oil and shit because he cant understand that not every lenses glass elements are designed to pass the light onto the sensor in the same wayi would tell you to end it all but its too entertaining watching your spastic ass struggle to justify shitty sigma rendering and resort to insulting left and right
>imagine buying a $1,600 Sigma lens when you have a plastic $200 chinese yongnuo rendering the same as a mid range priced zeiss lens.cope harder faggot gibbe more excuses
i have the 105mm sigma art for EF mount and both my tokina and yongnuo make better images and they COMBINED dont even cost 50% of the price of the sigma.
look at picrel. i didnt mark which lens shot what. try to guess. its very fucking easy to see which lens has 3d pop which doesnt.
shot under same conditions on the same body with same settings
dirt cheap lens vs $1,600 sigma, who wins?!
its not even about the money, its about shit lenses being shit. now suck my 3d cock
>inb4 he starts brain spasming and making excuses