Quoted By:
As for:
> """Intimate""" purpose mixed with evil light, a union of opposite
This is exactly what I like about the contrast patterns of UV photography and the subtle textures of the skin it depicts. It makes people "ugly" but doesn't change what they are. I have a much less philosophically aesthetic interest. It might be my lack of a religious or spiritual core that makes me uninterested in ideas of "evil" or "good". When I speak of "intimacy" I am speaking of "closeness", "bareness" and similar notions. There's no moral-social character imbued in my head. I'm stripping people of the softening qualities of the visible spectrum. What you make of that is not my concern. Now that you've got me thinking of it, I wouldn't call it "evil" any more than I'd call it "good". It's beautiful to me, as a spectacle; very literally "awesome". To have a conventionally attractive woman come to my house and have every freckle and sunburn bury whatever it is in her that normally dazzles all her social peers is a most entertaining sorcery. Given the wounded egos I've spurred, maybe I'm the evil one hahahaha
