>>4367789>>4367790>>4367791>samefagging again>still nophotoThis is better than a m43 meltdown.
>nooooo the comparisons are invalid!!!How exactly?
>crickets>>4367790>things that never happened, the postCope and seethe.
>>4367792>samefag meltdown-in-progressWhen you use the same exact language and childish insults, everyone knows it's the same person.
>>4367793>"the left side is clearly more detailed!!!">still can't circle wherelol
>it's a good thing you quit photographyWho do you think you're talking to? Did someone else cause you to seethe like this in the past? Was it a m43 or Sony thread?
>The funniest part about your meltdown is I told you exactly which digital cameras always beat film>"told"I've "shown" you that at 50mp it's over for 6x9. This is a photography board. Nobody gives a shit about "telling."
>https://www.onlandscape.co.uk/2014/12/36-megapixels-vs-6x7-velvia/>36mp and nearest neighbor scalingWhy do you have to cheat? Show us a real world 6x9, on something other than microfilm, that clearly beats 50mp FF or GFX. I mean does your upload button not work or something?
>https://jpbuffington.com/?p=167>words>theories> 1000:1 line chart testsReminder of how this started many threads ago...
>noooo digital is only better on line chartsAnd now...
>FORGET THE REAL WORLD, LOOK AT THIS LINE CHART!!!You're going to really lose it with the upcoming samples. I wish I could take a whole day off and finish everything fast, I want to taste your tears.
