>>3864586>contrast>flare/coma suppression,Those are arguments against film lenses. Especially those that lack coating.
>color renderingSomething which smarphones are known to be good at manipulating.
>texture,Is that an attempt padding the list or did you just failed the copypaste from your favourite reviewer?
>bokehAlready addressed this you used the "good enough" argument to defend film lenses, than you will be susceptible when smartphonefags use that same argument with their artificial bokeh.
>distortionSame as above, if you're okay with the sharpness of shitty film lenses, then you will be okay with software corrected distortion too.
But actually, this is an argument for smartphone optics which have new technologies your film lenses could never dream of, pic related.
>field curvatureThat's an argument in favour of smartphones.
>handlingThat's your one and only win so far.
See? If you had just listed this shit from the get go, we could have cleared that mess since much of these topics on your list are speaking against film lenses despite you smugly pretending they were in your favour.
