>>3751394>So you're hating on a photographer, but you have emulated his style, and have taken photos like him? That's hypocritical and pretentious at the same time.As I said, it was a joke. I did it privately. It's parody. I've also done other similar stuff like posting a pic of an intentionally generic sunset in a "recent photo" thread.
Didn't get nearly as much hate as I was hoping, only two replies:
>Kill me.>diamond dozen sunset shot, atleast the horizon is even.>Art is something people like you will never understand. Terry was never recognised on connections, he was recognised on his innovations and his style. Any painter can say that he can paint like a Monet. But there was only one Monet. He originated his style. It's same with Terry.Monet actually created something, what Terry did was basically what every beginner normie does at some point.
>>3751403>This is why photography is such shit industry/art form. Sure you can find pretentious art films but you can't find the same ratio of success to /artistrly/skill/effort as you do with some of these photographers. Absolutely, also I think Jodorowsky is very talented. I wouldn't exactly call him pretentious, see The Holy Mountain. Beautiful imagery at the very least. Also look at Rhein II, another example of the circlejerk that the photo industry is.
>It very much is just a contacts thing, now I don't know his background and maybe he did built those connection from no zero with charisma, but its all just circle jerking.Absolutely this.
>>3751447This kek
>>3751450It's what he's known for.
