>>4289501>>4289497Top is every brand RAW with the same C1 settings. Some of the differences would be easier (or harder) to see in real world usage, like skin-tones. Bigger variety with in-camera jpgs.
There is some variance, but you can kinda get whatever you want from any brand/ It can be a pain to try to match different cameras exactly though, but I see pics I like (and dislike) color-wise from every brands.
Bot is the same camera, but with different lenses. For as much talk of body color, no one really brings up how varied lenses are in color too.
>>4289518Anamorphic on phone feels so memey to me. You do know you have to edit every picture taken with anamorphic to undo the squeeze right? You can also crop to give the appearance of width, and bokeh filters for the more oval bokeh.
>>4289568I use both. Strongly prefer the X-T5 for a few reasons and it's usually the one I reach for, but the Zf is the goat for adapted glass. Nikon arguably has even more control for in-camera JPG shooting, but requires initial setup on PC (their preset software) to take full advantage (Zf does have like 20 bases built-in already though). I do prefer X-T5 + 33 f1.4 to Zf + 50 f1.8 S, even thought the later lens is superior.
