>>3796680Let's compare some kits with Fuji versus Sony. Both are a solid kit made up of fast primes and the latest body in the same price range.
Fuji:
137.7mm f/3.06 (90mm f/2)
85.68mm f/1.84 (56mm f/1.2)
53.55mm f/2.14 (35mm f/1.4)
35.19mm f/2.14 (23mm f/1.4)
24.48mm f/2.14 (16mm f/1.4)
X-T4 body
total: $6,144
Sony:
135mm f/1.8
85mm f/1.8
50mm f/1.8
35mm f/1.8
24mm f/1.4
a7 III body
total: $7,088
So with Sony, you get better low light performance, better DR performance, and faster lenses. With Fuji, you get a comfy body with dials, JPEG film sims, and you save $944 by going APS-C. Fuji is cheaper, but not by a huge margin. Of course if you wanted to save money you could go third party with lenses or make different choices on bodies for either platform but I'm just keeping it first party and latest ~24 megapickel bodies.
