>>3586900>>16x20>even you scientists in usa use metric. can you at least define what do you mean imperial or metric cause i dont want to calculate that USA/Liberia/Myanmar measurment systemYou have to be 18 or older to post here.
>>but even at 16x20 higher resolution sensors are going to be visibly better.>slightly to none. Bitch, I own a printer that can do 16x20. You've never even printed a 16x20.
>yielding lower noise level with further upscale would work out much effective on high iso and on low iso difference is almost dispensableEven at the tiny view size that results in the comparison tool it's clear that the choice is sharp vs soft with the same noise.
