>>2640446>camera's may render and meter differently, but 5k, is 5k, is 5k.>>2640449hands up who uses sooc jpegs. Well done Ken and isi.
Thanks for going through my personal flickr, which I don't use for my photography at all, except for beevision as a prospective employer wanted to see them on there.
>I ENJOY PURPLE BTWYep, I sent this to a friend to warn of the dangers of cheap PL filters
>>THIS IS ASTROPHOTOGRAPHY, I AM BECOME MOOP, CAPTURER OF STARLIGHTYep, explaining the 600 rule to someone and how bad things look if stars streak a little.
>fucking whyBackground on my tablet is why. You never taken a silhouette, sunset shot?
>pictures of weedSo I could show my housemate that he pulled that plant too early, very few amber trichs.
>>I figured out what exposure compensation wheel does! MOM!Might want to check the exifs again, this has literally nothing to do with exp comp. If you think exp comp doesn't change iso/ss/f then that would explain a lot.
>>2640475Again, congrats for going through my dumping ground from a couple of years ago, I like how you purposefully left out the better photos that happen to be in there.
>You seem to use auto white balance, which is fine...except when it's clearly a discrepancy, like here.Attached is a photo striped between that WB and adobe's auto WB. oh no, better luck next time at trying to put me down about snapshots I took at lunch as I had just grabbed a cheapo lens from a car boot sale. And what's discrepant about WB in any of those shots?
>restaurant>thinking restaurants serve heinz in giant squeezy plastic bottles on every table. Well, maybe they do in your part of the world, let's face it, the southern states aren't known for their class, sophistication, fine dining, refined tastes or just taste in general. Which is, I guess why you feel your photos are worth showing, because you people substitute culture for doctor pepper and jesus. 