Quoted By:
tl;dr:
i'm a poorfag and want mirrorless aps-c cammera with best image quality for ~$150 used
my long and convoluted question in which i don't really know what i'm asking:
i'm learning about photography for a couple of months now, i know basics of exposure, i know what shutter speed, aperture and is means and what rising/lowering each do to the image, i know that mpx isn't everything when it comes to image quality, that it's more about physical size of the sensor and individual pixels is very important, i know that camera megapixel isn't the most thing either and every lens can produce set amount of perceivable resolution but i don't really know what makes a camera have a good image quality, i'm talking about the body, how from a spec sheet can i know which camera have a better image quality?
i'm really poor and want to spend ~$150 on a digital camera, mirrorless becouse i can get cheap manual lenses and use with it, currently i struggle to find differences in sony mirrorles lineup, i'm talking about diferent versions of nex-3, nex-5 and a3000, most of them are in my price point used but i don't really know what difference in image quality i can expect between them, the sensor spec differs from 14 to 20mpx and i don't really need mind to go for the lower resolution if it's just the image size becouse my manual lenses probably produce like 5-8 percivable megapixels at most and that's on a film body
is there a big diference in image quality betwen those models?
what i mean is when you crop 1:1 sometimes every pixel has detail and sometimes it seems like it's a lower res image stretched, does the sensor have anything to do with this or is that only lens's perceivable resolution?
I JUST WANT A CHEAP CAMERA I CAN LEARN ABOUT PHOTOGRAPHY ON THAT DOESN'T MAKE BLURRY PICTURES
[spoiler:lit]I'M A FUCKING MORON BTW OK THANKS[/spoiler:lit]
