>>4106745Look Moop, the fact of the matter is the dynamic range is worse on the RP. What you're seeing there is the lower resolution that makes the noise apparently bigger.
Do a 5EV push on both and let's see what happens.
>Provide a link to even one RAW file in your entire collection with a DR greater than the range of the RP's sensor. Some people need and make use of high DR. For most people, it's a meme, a red herring at best.I have shots that have been ruined by Canon's poor range. Sure, they were technically tough and maybe I should have bracketed (sunsets where I had to pick between silhouettes or blowing the sky). AEB wasn't enough to compensate, manual bracketing would have been needed. And a tripod, of course. By the time I would have assembled the thing the photo would be gone, lost to my poor DR.
