>>3598035Here's what the sky looks like without any jpeg algo fucking with the colors, straight from raw to PNG.
>that creamy signature low light dynamic range Should be obvious to anyone that's owned one of these.
>>3598036The one in the OP looks like a video game because of the over-clarified post-processing. I reset it to default and you can see what the SooC RAW looks like in this
>>3597950 one.
Care to take a guess which brand it is? If you know your color science it should be relatively easy.