>>2720092...or a 50mm/1.7 M or A or whatever
Some of the faster lenses are a little tedious in actual use, and it's generally better to have a lens that is always sharp as fuck and optically clean, that you can nail the image every time.
Slightly more boke and less DOF isn't significant when it comes right down to it.
I *thought* used to love that 50/1.2 as a teenager, so I bought an A series a few years back. But I never use it. It's not sharp till f/2 anyway, and it's fucking impossible to focus and even when you do nail focus it can still look soft unless you get exactly the right bits of the subject in focus... a high contrast, blank, no hemispheres/prisms.. BLANK focusing screen helsp to be able to see this as it pos into focus, but not much. I used to focus bracket a lot with that lens and was always annoyed. On APS-C I consider a lens that is sharp and focuses easily in almost no light to be far superior. The FA 50/2.8 macro is that lens.
image related
