>>3757356Snapseed can handle RAW, can't it? Or is that a paid upgrade or something?
>>3760702>its usually better to shoot at lower ISO and bring out the details laterIt's never better to deliberately under-ISO a photo (unless exposing correctly would blow highlights). It depends on the camera but at best, it's neutral, and at worst, it will introduce significantly more noise than if you had boosted the signal in-sensor.
>>3760765>>They indeed are not satellites.>posts link demonstrating that they are satellitesNot had your coffee yet, /p/?
