>>3327896>As i'm focusing to infinity i won't have to worry about DOF right?Correct.
>>3327896>sounds good, i mean, i've heard a lot of negative attitude towards kit lenses, but if they can zoom into an airplane in the night and have a relatively clear picture then we're doing thisLet me show you what I mean. Here's 2 sets of images. The left 2 are 50mm and the right 2 are 300mm. The star is the only light source. The ISO is maxed out. The apertures are maxed out and I used Photoshop to kick up the exposure more. This is as fast as the shutter speeds can be without totally unusable motion-blurred images. To get better photos of non-lighted objects you'd need a tripod.
What you see here is the worst you can do with the best settings under such circumstances. I don't have a road nearby I can take shots of traffic, but if you get to test lenses at night, I suggest you test it on traffic to really see what it could do with a lighted UFO.
This is on a D3400 which is slightly worse at night than a D3300. Videos to follow.
