>>3620222For some odd reason i thought that guy said the mju 400 instead of the 300. Yeah the latter seems to have a decent one in the U.S. for 25 bucks, plus 10 for shipping, but it seems i might have to shell 20 more for a decent memory card. Or not, the thrill of being able to only shoot 12 images seems fun if a bit daunting in a long day.
Wanted something other than the old Sony Cybershot SuperSteadyShot in my room (pic related), 7.2mp, best camera i ever had but i busted its proprietary memory card and never resumed the photo hobby until i got a Canon DSLR, yet i don't know if it was because i shot more (and had more time) back then but i never achieved the same level of quality consistency. It almost always nailed decent focus while the Canon misses AF constantly and has plenty of hot/dead pixels brand new, but that Cyber is not digitshit enough for these kind of threads other than a few pushed examples.
Also that Mju guy's style reminds me of
>>3611378 