>>3553373>blame ambush for everythingHow original.
>>3553365Here's the thing: If
>>3553274 is the actual shot and you're trying to pass
>>3553365 off as a legit crop to display quality, you're still resizing the crop to hide the lack of sharpness (which isn't working). Here's the photo scaled up to the size of that crop. It's 0.88MP, not 20MP. So either you resized the crop much smaller or the photo itself is cropped incredibly heavily to begin with. Which is it? You claim that it is "as sharp as sharp can get at 20.4MP" when neither example shows this.
Your dishonesty is very obvious. Why should anyone believe anything you say? All anyone needs to do is use their eyes anyway... but still, man. What's the goal here? That's what I'm curious about.
