>>2585684Thanks?
>>2585951I'll take that all on board, thanks! I have to admit that it was a bit of a point and shoot moment because we wanted a picture of the bubble stuck to his face before it popped. and he wouldn't look at my partners phone (the flash from that is what's lighting this photo). Excuses aside, I will screenshot your post and also
>>2585954 so I can work on all the points.
>>2585954Thanks for the tip! Another excuse, this was about 8ft away from the river Thames and my partner had just let go of his hand and moved out of frame, I shit myself, snapped a few quick shots before running to him before he thought about going towards the river. In hindsight, he was 100% safe due to gf being very close but hey ho.
>>2585975I'm pretty much on the same page as you in terms of experience so keep in mind my opinion/advice is likely wrong.
I really like the colours in this photo but I feel it may look a bit better with the saturation toned down a bit. I love whacking the slider up on pictures like this but the critic in me forces it back down to a more realistic tone.
>>2585977Same applies to this image although considerably less so. I want to be rude and say it's just a photo of a car on a gravel road but something about it pleases my eyes. I think it's the lines (gravel ends and grass starts, between grass and sky on both sides. The photo may have looked better minus the car, or it may have looked bland and boring with nothing of interest.
>>2585979Same as above. Also please resize the photos, it's for your own good because people get pretty arsey about it. Good results considering you say you have no experience and are shooting in manual!
Have another photo. Literally just a snapshit so don't go too hard pls.
