>>4042393I understand sometimes finding value in poor quality (whether caused by lack of skill or by poor quality equipment) images but there is nothing special about that specific goldin set except how remarkably terrible every photo is
honestly there are a couple of photos I liked from that set but looking at the rest of the images leads me to believe they were pure flukes.
It's not art, it's a mindless operation of a piece of consumer hardware.
I would be more inclined to call it something resembling art if there was any indication that the photographer put effort into their photos but there is nothing, no consistent style or themes
The video is a wannabe artist trying to justify his work by elevating shitty work. Even if you enjoyed those photos you shouldn't be parading it as an example of good photography
