>>4017490rip in peace. G95 is still good though. Its not like its a bad camera.
>>4017494According to the specs it is. I dont need super wide angle so I know nothing about it. I have heard that olympus bodies are superior to panasonics if all youre after is wide video because pannys get wobbly with those lenses due to their different stabilization or something.
>>4017497Yeah cross manufacturer lenses generally dont produce the best possible results. Like the 100-300 panny is considered one of the best value birding lenses, but only on panny bodies. On olympus bodies it produces pretty noticeable fringing because an olympus body doesnt correct for it in-body. I dont know why olympus and panasonic dont work together to make super compatible shit and make m43 that much more appealing
