>>4375873>>4375874you were trying to copy Bresson's cyclist photo but you don't realize his photo works not because of the cyclist, but because of the composition
>>4375865even if this wasn't shaky as hell, what are you shooting? what is it about?
what is ANY of these about?
all of them seem hasty and thoughtless
it feels like none of them matter even to you, like if you enjoyed putting a camera on your face and pressing a button as an end in itself, as if the resulting photos were almost like a collateral of your button pressing experience
and this thoughtlessness seems to permeate every step of your "workflow", which seems to be pressing button on camera 36 times > sending roll to lab > getting jpgs from them > dumping them all on this thread
>>4375878>>4375994this is proof you didn't even glance at your photos before posting them all here
the first thing I noticed was the horrible central point the image
if not even you would take the time to look at your photos, why would we?
>>4375879you didn't even notice there's something awfully wrong with these cables?
curating is a crucial part of photography
you didn't even look at your photos
you clearly didn't edit them either
you didn't compose any of them properly, none of them are particularly interesting, none of the subjects matter
it's a whole lot of nothing
good thing you had fun shooting, but it doesn't mean they're any good
