>>4370203>we have an anon here who carefully scans all of his 35mm with an a7rii and the actual results he gets exceed this graph significantlyWhere? Let's see it. Is there a comparison against a 24mp camera on the same or a similar target?
>>4370215>nophotos80mp. Sure kid.
>>4370223>>Retard repeats himselfThat's you. You've contributed nothing to the conversation across multiple threads. Just the same lies, name dropping, and nophotos.
>noooo it's scanner noise!It's grain that's pixelated because the Noritsu can't cleanly resolve grain like the Howtek can. Now are you going to tell me that film resolves details smaller than film grain? Please claim that so I can add to your retard list.
>No, it's not, a lot of fine texturing on the tire disappears despite "resolving grain". You're actually blind. Holy shit.Put together a comparison and circle it in red.
>Uh yeah, you're definitely going to beat stitched shots from a 150mp phase one of fluid mounted materials in a reprographic rigYou can't even align your home setup to within the tolerances necessary to do that.
>You have no idea how much better cameras are than drumsFirst, you don't even know what scanner is being discussed. Second, picrel is camera scan vs drum from:
https://www.norwichcamera.com/blogs/wsogmm/all-about-those-scansYou can get closer with a higher res DSLR/MILC, but you're chasing the drum scan, not ahead of it. Here are more tests:
https://petapixel.com/2020/01/29/film-scanning-shootout-drum-vs-fluid-mount-vs-dslr/He found drum was best for slides, wet mount high end flatbed for negs. Oops. (And I'm a fan of DSLR/MILC scanning.)
Once again, nophotos vs photos, photos win.