>>3283581Thanks. Do you have experience with the f/1.4 lenses too or just the f/2.8 pancake?
>>3283582Please don't spoonfeed.
>>3283583Are you capable of understanding why I pointed out that you were offering your opinion despite being totally ignorant about the subject?
>hurrdurr there is no AF>hurrdurr you need to use an adapter >hurrdurr it's not a native lens>hurrdurr i think i made an argument at some point so you'd better make an argument to "rebut" meThe Samyang lenses ARE native E-mount lenses, since Sony opened up their mount to third parties. These lenses DO have autofocus, natively. You don't need an adapter, whatsoever, for these lenses. At no point did you present anything resembling an argument, but no argument is required in the first place to point out that someone doesn't have a clue what they're talking about. Your post was a violation of Global Rule 6 and should catch you a ban in a perfect world.
