>>3411869This is a 100% crop at what dpi? 3600?
Your lens and scanner setup is fine, the only variable left is the film used. There's big differences in grain between the cheapest consumer stuff (fuji c200, kodak colorplus), and the better stuff like Portra 160, Ektar, Provia.
The image you posted looks like grain, no digital noise. At 100%, scans need some sharpening for printing (even digital photos actually).
Also
>Also I just scan with silverfast as "positive", load it into LR and use negative lab pro with auto settings and minimal adjustments if there's a color cast or the auto density didn't work properly.Not sure this is the best workflow. I've always gotten better results from Silverfast, in terms of colour, and especially when the negative is "difficult" (too bright/too dark), because any adjustment in SIlverfast will be using the raw scanner data, while when exporting as positive and adjusting later, you're editing a jpeg or tiff.
