>>3775564I use tilt to make the plane of focus match the most important parts of the scene, often a foreground element and the distant peaks for example. Then stopping down to f22 or f32 brings the midground and the rest of the scene into acceptable focus. I also use a focus spread method using a millimeter scale on the camera bed to determine a "hyperfocal" point midway between the near and far subjects. This is particularly useful in the forest where tilt doesn't help.
>>3775673That sunset was truly nuts on saturation. I also shot a sheet on E100, but the windmill was facing a less appealing direction and the shadow detail at the bottom of the cloud was meh. I was able to use the slide shot as a color reference for the Portra scan which was very helpful.
>>3775783This man is right. Movements are the only way you'll be able to get decent focus with 4x5. The few times I've shot 6x7 I've been frustrated with how limited you are without movements, I couldn't imagine working with a 4x5 without them.
>>3775856I can't leave. Been coming since before I shot 4x5.
>>3775860I wonder if I have any of those images somewhere, I don't think I do. I was using a joke of a 1.3MP kodak point and shoot. It was probably some awful photos of the Arizona desert from 2004.
