>>3144020>I've probably spent more time researching Eggleston and looking at Eggleston's photos and really doing a deep-dive into Eggleston's body of work than any photographer I actually like.Kk fair enough, i don't really know anything about his process desu
But the pictures themselves - purely on a technical level - are the work of a professional
Show me someone here (or elsewhere) with the kind of colour harmonies he had. He is up there with Rothko and Matisse. Even if someone else is doing his curating, he is recognizing and figuring in colour in his shots before he takes them
His use of line and shape is also first-rate
I think
>>3143900 is pretty much on the money
