>>4077620>RAW files can still have pre-baked noise reduction built inisn't the point of a comparison to compare things that are different? how else would you compare them then?
>how would you compare them then?i like how you're so critical of the differences of the RAW, and then speak about differences in sharpness without the obvious disclaimer that they are taken with different lenses
that tool is good for seeing practical noise differences, and not much else
>This is a good example of how resolution is limited by sensor size, not MP count thoughso what does it mean when higher res FF yields more details?
