>>3377648The point is to do your photography thing, but to also not worry about the annoying quirks of digital sensors.
No more looking at a scene you know could get with film, but not bothering to pick up the camera because you know it will look like ass. Youmst' Android allows't'd've set ISO 12800? Use it, you madman. Just show us something worth looking at or thinking about. Here, as long as a picture can deliver to the viewer the feeling you had when you took it, it's a successful picture. This also lowers the bar for entry in terms of cost. If you have a camera that is sufficiently not-awful in the right way, you can produce a beautiful picture.
Forget about tack sharpness, the eternal worrying about digital highlight detail and noise. Embrace flaws, because flaw is beauty. It's about judging a picture for the picture, not a sensor's signal-to-noise ratio.
